NYMC Faculty Publications
The Impact of Aorto-Uni-Iliac Graft Configuration on Outcomes of Endovascular Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Author Type(s)
Faculty
DOI
10.1016/j.jvs.2022.11.011
Journal Title
Journal of Vascular Surgery
First Page
1054
Last Page
1060.e1
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-1-2023
Department
Surgery
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Endovascular aneurysm repair has improved outcomes for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) compared with open repair. We examined the impact of aorto-uni-iliac (AUI) vs standard bifurcated endograft configuration on outcomes in rAAA. METHODS: Patients 18 years or older in the Vascular Quality Initiative database who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair for rAAA from January 2011 to April 2020 were included. Patient characteristics were analyzed by graft configuration: AUI or standard bifurcated. Primary and secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, postoperative major adverse events (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, mesenteric ischemia, lower extremity embolization, dialysis requirement, reoperation, pneumonia, or reintubation), and 1-year mortality. A subset propensity-score matched cohort was also analyzed. RESULTS: We included 2717 patients: 151 had AUI and 2566 had standard bifurcated repair. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, major medical comorbidities, anatomic aortic neck characteristics, or rates of conversion to open repair. Patients who underwent AUI were more commonly female (30% vs 22%, P = .011) and had a history of congestive heart failure (19% vs 12%, P = .013). Perioperatively, patients who underwent AUI had a significantly higher incidence of cardiac arrest (15% vs 7%, P < .001), greater intraoperative blood loss (1.3 L vs 0.6 L, P < .001), longer operative duration (218 minutes vs 138 minutes, P < .0001), higher incidence of major adverse events (46.3% vs 33.3%, P = .001), and prolonged intensive care unit (7 vs 4.7 days, P = .0006) and overall hospital length of stay (11.4 vs 8.1 days, P = .0003). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses demonstrated significant differences in 30-day (31.1% vs 20.2%, log-rank P = .001) and 1-year mortality (41.7% vs 27.7%, log-rank P = .001). The propensity-score matched cohort demonstrated similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The AUI configuration for rAAA appears to be implemented in a sicker cohort of patients and is associated with worse perioperative and 1-year outcomes compared with a bifurcated graft configuration, which was also seen on propensity-matched analysis. Standard bifurcated graft configuration may be the preferred approach in the management of rAAA unless AUI configuration is mandated by patient anatomy or other extenuating circumstances.
Recommended Citation
Rokosh, R. S., Chang, H., Lui, A., Rockman, C. B., Patel, V. I., Johnson, W., Siracuse, J. J., Cayne, N. S., Jacobowitz, G. R., & Garg, K. (2023). The Impact of Aorto-Uni-Iliac Graft Configuration on Outcomes of Endovascular Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 77 (4), 1054-1060.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2022.11.011