Effects of Obesity on Urogynecologic Prolapse Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors

Nancy E. Ringel, Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky; the Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist, Houston, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Columbian Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; the Division of Female Urology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, and KPC Healthcare, Hemet, California; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, and Bela Vida Urogynecology, Celebration, Florida; the Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper Health University, Camden, New Jersey; the Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio; the International Medical Response Foundation, Brooklyn, and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York; and the Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Stacy M. Lenger
Rachel High
Alexandriah Alas
Sara Houlihan
Olivia H. Chang
Jon Pennycuff
Ruchira Singh
Amanda White
Lioudmila Lipitskaia
Sadikah Behbehani
David Sheyn
Bela Kudish
Mikio Nihira
Ambereen Sleemi
Cara GrimesFollow
Ankita GuptaFollow
Ethan M. Balk
Danielle D. AntoshFollow

Author Type(s)

Faculty

DOI

10.1097/AOG.0000000000005525

Journal Title

Obstetrics and Gynecology

First Page

539

Last Page

549

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

4-1-2024

Department

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in patients from various body mass index (BMI) categories to determine the association between obesity and surgical outcomes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to April 12, 2022; ClinicalTrials.gov was searched in September 2022 (PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022326255). Randomized and nonrandomized studies of urogynecologic POP surgery outcomes were accepted in which categories of BMI or obesity were compared. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: In total, 9,037 abstracts were screened; 759 abstracts were identified for full-text screening, and 31 articles were accepted for inclusion and data were extracted. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Studies were extracted for participant information, intervention, comparator, and outcomes, including subjective outcomes, objective outcomes, and complications. Outcomes were compared among obesity categories (eg, BMI 30-34.9, 35-40, higher than 40), and meta-analysis was performed among different surgical approaches. Individual studies reported varying results as to whether obesity affects surgical outcomes. By meta-analysis, obesity (BMI 30 or higher) is associated with an increased odds of objective prolapse recurrence after vaginal prolapse repair (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% CI, 1.14-1.67) and after prolapse repair from any surgical approach (OR 1.31, 95% CI, 1.12-1.53) and with complications such as mesh exposure after both vaginal and laparoscopic POP repair (OR 2.10, 95% CI, 1.01-4.39). CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with increased likelihood of prolapse recurrence and mesh complications after POP repair. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022326255.

Recommended Citation

Ringel, N. E., Lenger, S. M., High, R., Alas, A., Houlihan, S., Chang, O. H., Pennycuff, J., Singh, R., White, A., Lipitskaia, L., Behbehani, S., Sheyn, D., Kudish, B., Nihira, M., Sleemi, A., Grimes, C., Gupta, A., Balk, E. M., & Antosh, D. D. (2024). Effects of Obesity on Urogynecologic Prolapse Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 143 (4), 539-549. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005525