NYMC Faculty Publications

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Daridorexant, Lemborexant, and Suvorexant for Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Author Type(s)

Faculty

DOI

10.1038/s41398-025-03439-8

Journal Title

Translational Psychiatry

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-1-2025

Department

Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences

Abstract

Background: In order to appraise the risk-benefit balance of the three available dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs; daridorexant, lemborexant, and suvorexant) for the management of adults with insomnia, we conducted a systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis. Methods: Included were all published double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of these agents. Outcomes included subjective time to sleep onset at month 1 (sTSO, primary), subjective total sleep time at month 1 (sTST, co-primary), subjective wake after sleep onset at month 1, Insomnia Severity Index scores at month 1, all-cause discontinuation, discontinuation due to adverse events, and the incidence of individual adverse events such as somnolence, dizziness, falls, headache, nasopharyngitis, and upper respiratory tract infection. Results: This meta-analysis included eight trials (5198 adults, average age = 56.33 years, 67.84% female). The treatment arms included daridorexant 25 mg/day (DAR25), daridorexant 50 mg/day (DAR50), lemborexant 5 mg/day (LEM5), lemborexant 10 mg/day (LEM10), suvorexant 20 mg/day (15 mg/day for people ≥65years, SUV20/15), and placebo. All active-treatments outperformed placebo in terms of all efficacy outcomes. The standardized mean difference (95% CI) in primary outcomes ranged from; sTSO: −0.430 (−0.568, −0.292) for LEM10 to −0.164 (−0.296, −0.031) for SUV20/15 and sTST: −0.475 (−0.593, −0.357) for DRA50 to −0.206 (−0.330, −0.082) for LEM5. An additional sensitivity analysis suggested that DRA25, LEM10, and SUV20/15 were associated with a higher incidence of somnolence compared to a placebo. Conclusions: Considering that there is no evidence that DORAs are associated with physiological tolerance, withdrawal symptoms, or rebound insomnia when abruptly discontinued, and that sleep architecture is not adversely affected, the DORAs appear to be a favorable choice in managing insomnia disorder in adults.

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS