NYMC Faculty Publications
Incidence and Outcome of Procedural Distal Emboli Using the Penumbra Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke
Author Type(s)
Faculty
DOI
10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010216
Journal Title
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
First Page
135
Last Page
138
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-1-2013
Department
Neurology
Second Department
Neurosurgery
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Incidence, Intracranial Embolism, Male, Middle Aged, Radiography, Retrospective Studies, Stroke, Thrombectomy, Treatment Outcome
Disciplines
Medicine and Health Sciences
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Penumbra system is effective for recanalization of the primary arterial occlusion (PAO) in acute stroke. However, clinical outcomes are not as promising. The authors hypothesized that the formation of procedural distal emboli (PDE) during mechanical thrombectomy may lead to poorer patient outcomes.
DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with the Penumbra system was undertaken. Patients' outcome was evaluated by comparing discharge National Institute of Health stroke scale and modified Rankin score (mRS) of patients with and without PDE.
RESULTS: Out of 20 patients reviewed, recanalization of PAO was 100%. Six patients (30%) were confirmed to have PDE, of which two died (33.3%) and one (16.7%) had mRS of 2 or less. Of the 14 patients without PDE, three died (21.4%) and six (42.9%) had mRS of 2 or less. In the patient group who survived, mean National Institute of Health stroke scale decrease was only 2.3 in patients with PDE versus a decrease of 10.6 in patients without PDE.
CONCLUSIONS: In spite of PAO recanalization, distal emboli formed subsequent to Penumbra thrombectomy may contribute to poorer clinical outcome in acute stroke patients.
Recommended Citation
Todo, A., Minaeian, A., Sahni, R., & Chao, K. H. (2013). Incidence and Outcome of Procedural Distal Emboli Using the Penumbra Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 5 (2), 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010216
