Predictive Accuracy of 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring versus Clinic Blood Pressure for Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors

• Hamidreza Soleimani, Tehran Heart Center
• Negin S.H. Mohammadi, Tehran Heart Center
• Sara M. Namin, Tehran Heart Center
• Amir Nasrollahizadeh, Tehran Heart Center
• Tara Azardar, Tehran Heart Center
• Kimia Najafi, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
• Mehmet Cilingiroglu, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
• Mushabbar Syed, Stritch School of Medicine
• Mani K. Askari, College of Medicine and Life Sciences
• Rahul Gupta, Lehigh Valley Hospital and Health Network
• Wilbert S. Aronow, Westchester Medical Center
• Kaveh Hosseini, Tehran Heart Center

DOI

10.2174/0115734021337639250203175636

Journal Title

Current Hypertension Reviews

First Page

102

Last Page

116

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1-2025

Department

Medicine

Keywords

ambulatory blood pressure, antihypertensive drugs, blood pressure monitoring, cardiovascular outcomes, Clinical blood pressure, hypertension

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences

Abstract

Introduction: According to current clinical practice guidelines, Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (ABPM) is recommended to confirm diagnoses of hypertension. It remains unclear as to which method is superior in predicting mortality outcomes. Methods: Prospective observational studies, comparing ABPM with Clinical Blood Pressure Measurements (CBPM), were included with outcomes of the study being all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Results: Nine studies with a total of 23,140 participants were included. Each 10-mmHg increase in 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was linked to a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.09–1.18), while Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement (CBPM) was not a significant predictor (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.90–1.13). Nighttime SBP increases of 10 mmHg were associated with a higher all-cause mortality risk than daytime SBP (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.11–1.21 versus HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05–1.12). For cardiovascular mortality, a 10 mmHg increase in SBP yielded an HR of 1.21 (95% CI: 1.16–1.27) for 24-hour ABPM compared to 1.08 (95% CI: 1.04–1.11) for CBPM. Similarly, for a 5 mmHg increase in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), the HR was 1.14 (95% CI: 1.07–1.20) for 24 hour ABPM versus 1.04 (95% CI: 1.01–1.07) for clinical DBP, highlighting 24-hour monitoring as a stronger predictor for cardiovascular mortality. Conclusion: The findings of this study support the superiority of ABPM measurements in predicting both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

Recommended Citation

Soleimani, H., Mohammadi, N., Namin, S., Nasrollahizadeh, A., Azardar, T., Najafi, K., Cilingiroglu, M., Syed, M., Askari, M., Gupta, R., Aronow, W., & Hosseini, K. (2025). Predictive Accuracy of 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring versus Clinic Blood Pressure for Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Current Hypertension Reviews, 21 (2), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734021337639250203175636