Outcomes After Arthroscopic Revision Bankart Repair: An Updated Systematic Review of Recent Literature
Author Type(s)
Student
Document Type
Review Article
Publication Date
2-2023
DOI
10.1016/j.arthro.2022.03.030
Journal Title
Arthroscopy
Abstract
PURPOSE: To provide an update of recent literature with a specialized focus on clinical outcomes following arthroscopic revision Bankart repair (ARBR) by performing a systematic review of all available literature published between 2013 and 2020.
METHODS: A literature search reporting clinical outcomes after ARBR was performed. Criteria for inclusion consisted of original studies; Level of Evidence of I-IV; studies focusing on clinical outcomes after ARBR published between January 1, 2013, and January 4, 2021; studies reporting recurrent dislocation or instability rate after ARBR; reoperation/revision following ARBR, return to sport rates following ARBR; and patient-reported outcomes. The primary outcomes of interest were failure defined as recurrent instability or dislocation, return to sport rates, and patient-reported outcomes at follow-up.
RESULTS: A large proportion of patients undergoing arthroscopic revision Bankart repair were male, ranging between 67.7% and 93.8%. Failure rate and return to sports rate ranged between 6.1% and 46.8% and 25.9% and 88.3%, respectively, when patients with significant or greater than 20% glenoid bone loss was excluded. Patient-reported outcome scores, which included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale, saw significant improvement over mean follow-up of ranging 21.64 to 60 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the failure rate and RTS rates after ARBR had a wide range, given the heterogeneity of the studies included, which varied in patient selection criteria pertaining to patients with greater than 20% glenoid bone. Although there have been advancements in arthroscopic techniques and a trend favoring arthroscopic stabilization procedures, there is a lack of consensus in recent literature for careful patient selection criteria that would minimize failure rates and maximize RTS rates after ARBR.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, a systematic review of Level III-IV studies.
Recommended Citation
Hong, I. S., Sonnenfeld, J. J., Sicat, C., Hong, R. S., Trofa, D. P., Schiffern, S. C., Hamid, N., Fleischli, J. E., & Saltzman, B. M. (2023). Outcomes After Arthroscopic Revision Bankart Repair: An Updated Systematic Review of Recent Literature. Arthroscopy, 39 (2), 438-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.03.030
