Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2018

Publication Title

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

DOI

10.5688/ajpe6274

Abstract

Objective. To determine whether differences based on gender exist among pharmacy students involved in cases of admitted cheating or other academic dishonesty and to assess perceptions of academic dishonesty.

Methods. Two cohorts of second-year male and female pharmacy students from four Northern California pharmacy programs were invited to complete a 45-item cross-sectional survey. Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s chi-squared test were used for statistical analysis.

Results. There were 330 surveys completed with a 59% response rate. No significant gender-based differences were found regarding admitted cheating in pharmacy school and in regards to participating in various forms of academically dishonest behavior. Female students were more likely than male students to report witnessing a classmate copying another student’s assignment. Male students were less likely than female students to perceive a student who distributed a stolen exam as a cheater.

Conclusion. No gender-based differences were noted in cases of admitted cheating or with regards to taking part in various forms of academically dishonest behavior. However, female students report witnessing cheating more than male students, and male students may have a more lenient perception toward academically dishonest behavior than female students. The information gathered from this study may provide further insight to pharmacy programs and educators regarding academic dishonesty at their institution.

Publisher's Statement

Originally published in the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(4) [Article 6274]. Reprinted with the permission of the publisher. The original material can be found here.

Download

Share

COinS