NYMC Faculty Publications

Does Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision of Rectal Cancer Improve Histopathology Metrics and/or Complication Rates? A Meta-Analysis

DOI

10.1016/j.suronc.2019.05.012

Journal Title

Surgical Oncology

First Page

47

Last Page

51

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

September 2019

Department

Surgery

Keywords

Circumferential resection margin, Rectal cancer, Robotic surgery, Total mesorectal excision, Transanal surgery

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) improves histopathology metrics and/or complication rates when compared to robotic total mesorectal excision (R-TME) of resectable rectal cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched by two independent researchers. Six observational studies totaling 1,572 patients (811 taTME; 761R-TME) were included after screening 14 potentially eligible records. Mantel-Haenszel method using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (OR (95%CI)) and inverse variance with mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (MD (95%CI)) as an effect measure for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively, was employed for meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity among effect estimates was evaluated using I(2) and Tau(2). RESULTS: Circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement rates (3.8% taTME; 5.3% R-TME) did not differ [OR (95%CI)=0.86 (0.35, 2.15); p=0.75] with low among-study heterogeneity (I(2)=21%). Complication rates (35.4% taTME; 32.3% R-TME) did not differ [OR (95%CI)=0.92 (0.64, 1.32); p=0.65], although with moderate among-study heterogeneity (I(2)=40%). CRM involvement [OR (95%CI)=0.76 (0.40, 1.43); p=0.40] and complication rates [OR (95%CI)=0.84 (0.59, 1.21); p=0.35] did not significantly differ in subgroup meta-analysis including mid- and low rectal cancer. Distal resection margin (mm) did not significantly differ between the interventions [MD (95%CI)=-0.41 (-1.29, 0.47); p=0.37]. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found that taTME of rectal cancer does not improve histopathology metrics and complication rates when compared to R-TME.

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 11
  • Captures
    • Readers: 42
see details

Share

COinS