Culprit-Only vs Multi-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with NSTE-ACS - A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors

Aaqib H. Malik, New York Medical CollegeFollow
Ammar Athar
Syed Zaid
Srikanth Yandrapalli
Suchith Shetty
Senada MalikFollow
Wilbert S. Aronow, New York Medical CollegeFollow
Hasan Ahmad, New York Medical CollegeFollow

DOI

10.1016/j.carrev.2020.02.018

Journal Title

Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine

First Page

804

Last Page

806

Document Type

Review Article

Publication Date

6-2020

Department

Medicine

Keywords

Acute Coronary Syndrome, Humans, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Stents, Treatment Outcome

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences

Recommended Citation

Malik, A. H., Athar, A., Zaid, S., Yandrapalli, S., Shetty, S., Malik, S., Aronow, W. S., & Ahmad, H. (2020). Culprit-Only vs Multi-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with NSTE-ACS - A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 21 (6), 804-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2020.02.018