NYMC Faculty Publications

Sex Modifies the Severity and Outcome of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Author Type(s)

Faculty

DOI

10.1002/ana.27123

Journal Title

Annals of Neurology

First Page

232

Last Page

241

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2-1-2025

Department

Neurology

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences

Abstract

Objective: The limited existing evidence on sex differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with spontaneous, non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) comes from small, single-center studies. Here, we performed an individual patient data meta-analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials and 1 multi-ethnic observational study of ICH to investigate the impact of sex on ICH severity and outcome. Methods: Inclusion criteria in our study were a neuroimaging-confirmed ICH. We evaluated whether sex was associated with ICH severity (hematoma volume and expansion) and poor functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale >3) 3 or 6 months after the ICH. Results: A total of 4,812 ICH patients were evaluated (mean age 62, 40% female). Males with ICH were younger, more likely to be smokers and have diabetes, and less likely to be on anticoagulants (all p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, male sex was associated with non-lobar location (odds ratio [OR]: 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.39–1.92]; p < 0.001), larger hemorrhages (beta: 0.16 [0.08–0.23]; p < 0.001) and a higher risk of hematoma expansion (OR: 1.43 [1.20–1.71]; p < 0.001). Despite the larger hemorrhage volume and higher risk of expansion, male sex was associated with a 24% lower risk of poor outcomes (OR: 0.76 [0.64–0.90]; p = 0.002). Interpretation: Compared to females, males with ICH have larger bleeds and higher risk of hematoma expansion. Despite the larger bleeds and higher risk of hematoma expansion, males with ICH have lower risk of poor outcomes. Our results suggest that the biology and clinical trajectory are different in females and males with ICH, supporting sex-specific research in this condition. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:232–241.

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS